Talk:Keep Britain Tidy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Corporate use of Tidyman logo

(German) Wrigley's chewing gum packaging has the Tidyman logo on it. Is it common for product packagings to have this logo on it - and if yes, are there "official" cooperations between companies and the Keep Britain Tidy campaign? I'm wondering whether the Tidyman logo was initially created for this campaign. --Abdull (talk) 09:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

"Litterbug, native species rendered endagered as a result of the Keep Britain Tidy campaign."
Is there any inkling of fact in this, or is it simply vandalism? 86.29.4.145 (talk) 11:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Litterbug disambiguation page listed a type of cockroach not native to Britain, as well as "a person who litters." These sort of litterbugs are almost certainly not endangered, nor are they distinguishable from your average homo sapiens, the vandalism has been removed. - DorkyDude

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keep Britain Tidy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109131511/http://www.blueflag.org.uk/ to http://www.blueflag.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]